BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend catheter ablation for symptom relief in patients with atrial fibrillation. The aim of this trial was to ascertain whether catheter ablation improves atrial fibrillation-related quality of life more than a sham procedure.
METHODS: PVI-SHAM-AF was a double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial conducted at nine study sites in Germany and Poland. Patients aged 18 years or older with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to catheter ablation or a sham procedure using an automated online randomisation system with variable block sizes, stratified by trial site. The primary endpoint was the between-group difference in change from baseline to 6 months in the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on the Quality-of-life Questionnaire (AFEQT) summary score. The prespecified primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population and included all randomly assigned patients, with missing data handled by multiple imputation. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05119231) and 12-month follow-up is ongoing.
FINDINGS: Between Nov 12, 2021, and Nov 3, 2025, 1199 patients were invited to participate in the study and 262 patients consented and were randomly assigned: 173 patients to catheter ablation and 89 to sham. The median age was 67 years (IQR 62-73); 134 (51%) were female and 128 (49%) were male. Median follow-up was 184 days (IQR 181-191). At 6 months, the mean AFEQT summary score had increased from 61·3 (SD 20·1) to 81·1 (16·6) in the catheter ablation group and from 59·2 (19·0) to 74·9 (19·5) in the sham control group. The Hodges-Lehmann estimate of the between-group difference in change was 2·6 (95% CI -2·7 to 8·0; p=0·36). One death occurred in each group; neither was considered related to the study procedure. Serious adverse events adjudicated as related or possibly related to the study procedure occurred in ten unique patients: six patients in the catheter ablation group and four patients in the sham control group. One of these was an ischaemic stroke occurred in the sham control group.
INTERPRETATION: Catheter ablation did not demonstrate superiority over a sham procedure for improving atrial fibrillation-related quality of life at 6 months.
FUNDING: Helios Gesundheit (Förderung Leipziger Herzmedizin).
| Discipline Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Family Medicine (FM)/General Practice (GP) |  |
| General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US) | |
| Cardiology | |
This is an interesting study of sham-controlled catheter ablation for AF measuring symptoms as an outcome. It finds no significant difference in symptom scores. We then must consider carefully who should be referred for catheter ablation, and cardiologists ought to counsel wisely. For primary care physicians, this is worth knowing due to the burden of AF present in the population.
Great courage to do a sham study. Very helpful!
We need clear confirmation or rebuttal of this study. The patient population is entitled to know whether this standard treatment is valid or not.
